SHOP JOB AT LUXURY FASHION LABEL IS A “LEARNING OPPORTUNITY” FOR OUR STUDENTS, INSISTS UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
The university currently advertising a controversial unpaid “intern sales assistant” position at luxury fashion label Balenciaga – which looks like a regular shop job to everyone else on the planet – has refused to apologise, despite outrage from their students and graduates.
When contacted by Graduate Fog, a spokesperson for the University of the Arts insisted that the role contains multiple valuable a “learning opportunities” for their students. The spokesperson claimed it IS in line with their policy on advertising unpaid work placements because the advert does not include mention of set hours and the main objective of the role is stated as to “learn the basic skills in selling.” (By “learning opportunities”, we assume s/he is referring to the chance to “learn how to replenish stock” and “develop product knowledge and provide customer service” as outlined in the advert). We have had no response at all from Balenciaga about the advert.
Last week, the reaction from graduates to our story about the now-notorious Balenciaga “intern sales assistant” was one of unanimous anger and disgust. So why does the university that advertised the role think it’s perfectly fine? Is it a sign that universities are lagging behind their students (hello, customers) on this controversial issue of unpaid internships? Shouldn’t they stop helping companies like Balanciaga by promoting ‘opportunities’ like this to their students? Whose side are they on?
A mysterious unnamed spokesperson from the University of the Arts London – which includes Central St Martins, London College of Fashion, the London College of Communication, Chelsea College of Art and Design, Camberwell College of Arts and Wimbledon College of Art – wrote yesterday:
To: Graduate Fog
From: ‘Jobs Online’, Creative Opportunities, University of the Arts London
Date: Monday 21 May 2012Dear Tanya
Thank you for your email.
The details of the work placement offered by Balenciaga emphasise the learning opportunities available to the student during their time with the company. The objective of the placement was ‘to learn the basic skills in selling.’ The advert did not state required duties or work or particular hours of work that would have constituted a contract of employment and therefore entitled the student to claim the National Minimum Wage.
Creative Opportunities is committed to supporting and advising our students and graduates in the area of employment and unpaid work placements. Each work placement advertised on our website must comply with our Work Placement Policy and we regularly reject opportunities that do not comply with this. Please see our full Work Placement Policy here: http://creativeopportunities.arts.ac.uk/pages/work-placement-policy
Kind regards
Creative Opportunities
Graduate Fog has felt for some time that universities are the weak link the chain when it comes to fighting the spread of unpaid internships. Despite advice from their official body AGCAS – which says they should not advertise these roles – too many universities are ignoring this as it appears to suit their agenda (getting as many of you ’employed’ as possible six months after graduation, even if you’re working for nothing).
They are also failing to inform you about your legal rights to pay – and that most unpaid internships are illegal. It is shocking that despite all the campaign work done by websites like this and our friends at Intern Aware, Internocracy and Interns Anonymous, only 10% of graduates know that unpaid internships are illegal – and 14% found their unpaid internship through their university careers service. Why aren’t the universities shouting about this issue from the rooftops?
They should have posters everywhere, and be running high-profile awareness campaigns so that their students and graduates can join the fight for a fairer deal for interns. Instead, they’re pretty much silent. Their feeble response is that they’ll tell you if you ask – and that they’ve buried a yawnsome page on their website called ‘Graduates’ employment rights’ somewhere at the back of their website (Who’s going to read that?).
Meanwhile, they ignore our requests for help and tell us they’ve done everything they can as the issue is “too political” for them to get involved with (You know who you are). Hmm. It’s almost as if your universities don’t want you to know the facts about this issue. Now, why do you think that might be?
But they can’t keep hiding from us – or ignoring this issue forever. Earlier this year, the NUS pledged to put pressure on universities which continue to advertise unpaid internships – and we are looking forward to an update on the situation shortly. Graduate Fog believes we need to be much, much tougher on them. They’re charging you £9,000 a year – and then telling you to go and work for free? Seriously?)
And word about unpaid internships is spreading – even without their help. As more and more students and graduates discover the truth about unpaid internships – and tell their friends – we look forward to universities’ ‘customers’ asking increasingly uncomfortable questions about why their university feels it’s approprite to promote these (often illegal) jobs to them, as if they’re genuine opportunities for career progression. We all know what they really are – and almighty con. Why won’t the universities just admit it?
*DOES YOUR UNIVERSITY ADVERTISE UNPAID INTERNSHIPS?
Should the University of the Arts apologise for posting the Balenciaga advert, and promoting what appears to be an unpaid shop job as if it’s a genuine opportunity? Did your university do anything to teach you about your rights to pay – and that many unpaid internships are illegal? If you think universities should be doing more, why aren’t they?
http://www.arts.ac.uk/pressoffice/pressreleasearchive/2010/paidinternplanforcreativeindustries/
Thanks Guy
Grr, i hate it when people make out they’re being generous for offering piddly little wages far below the minimum wage… £100 a week is NOT pay!!
Tanya, did you read the whole article?
First paragraph:
“Called the Creative Graduate Internship Programme, University of the Arts London will offer 100 small businesses £100 a week towards paying interns’ wages”
Last paragraph:
“Funding is available for 100 internships for either eight or twelve week placements. Employers must pay interns at least National Minimum Wage.”
They’re insisting that the National Minimumum Wage is paid, I don’t see how you’ve come to that conclusion?
Nonetheless, the university should not be advertising an unpaid work placement at all. Either pay your staff or don’t hire them, it’s as simple as that.
Craig, although that article says that employers must pay NMW, the placement at Balenciaga is clearly advertised as unpaid, so therefore it contradicts the University’s requirements and should not be advertised.
My point isn’t about Balenciaga.
Tanya said £100 a week isn’t a wage (I agree). But she has missed the part of the article that stated the employers taking part in the scheme must pay NMW. I was correcting that.
My point related specifically to the scheme which Guy posted to. We don’t know if Balenciaga are taking part in the scheme, and hence we don’t know if they’re bound by the funding rules, but seeing as the University isn’t going to take it down, I’d guess they’re not part of the scheme.