AND DOES DEMAND FOR “PHYSICAL FITNESS” EXCLUDE THOSE WITH DISABILITIES?
* UPDATE, 13 MAY: STORY PICKED UP IN THE SUN! *
The BBC has been slammed for advertising two-week “work experience” placements at Wimbledon 2019 which appear to be unpaid, despite including duties such as “running errands; assisting film crews/radio reporters; collecting and distributing press releases/orders of play/running orders etc; meeting programme guests and escorting around grounds; general office duties; prop sourcing; assisting commentators including delivering refreshments.”
The advert – posted on the BBC’s own job board – states that applicants for the seven production placements “Must be available for [the] full run of Wimbledon, including set-up days: Thursday 27 June to Monday 15 June inclusive.” Unfortunately, the ‘job category’ is stated as ‘volunteering’.
bbc are advertising a work experience position at wimbledon that includes duties like “running errands… collecting and distributing press releases/running orders etc… general office duties; prop sourcing; delivering refreshments” so… a runner’s role then?
– Liz Tresidder (@liztresidder) April 27, 2019
Shame on the BBC offering “unpaid work experience” at Wimbledon – one of the apparently richest events in the calendar. Call them out https://t.co/XzK5dqjnbN
– thermalimageguy (@thermalimageguy) April 28, 2019
Graduate Fog has challenged the BBC over how they feel the planned placements at Wimbledon 2019 fit with UK employment law, and also with the corporation’s stated commitments to diversity and inclusion (our full email is below).
According to the National Minimum Wage law, if a person works set hours, has set responsibilities and does work that would otherwise need to be done by a paid member of staff, they are a ‘worker’. They must be paid at least the National Minimum Wage, even if they claim they are happy to work for free. The length of the placement is irrelevant.
There seems to be no doubt that these positions will involve real work (in other words, they are not just shadowing). BBC Sport presenter Eleanor Oldroyd proudly described the placement as ‘exhausting’ when promoting it to her 32,000 followers – raising eyebrows on Twitter:
I would if it was paid. I know someone else who might, but he would want paying for it 🙂 @tannerman774 😌
– 📻 RadioJournoLee (@radiojournolee) April 27, 2019
Fellow BBC presenter Karthi Gnanasegaram also retweeted the opportunity:
– Karthi Gnanasegaram (@KarthiSport) April 29, 2019
Graduate Fog was also shocked to see a line in the ad stating: “Physical fitness is essential” – appearing to disqualify those with disabilities before they’ve even applied. Here is the advert in full:
Graduate Fog’s founder Tanya de Grunwald said the BBC’s ad was “tone deaf,” adding:
“This is not work experience – this is work. Okay, these placements only last two weeks – but they fail our fair internships test on both grounds: exploitation and exclusion.
“They exploit because the BBC acknowledges that successful applicants will perform valuable labour, yet the corporation clearly plans to take advantage of their desperation for experience by withholding a salary. And they exclude because the placements are out of reach to anyone who can’t afford to live in London for two weeks without pay.
“It’s also shocking that the author of the advert has spelled out a need for ‘physical fitness’. I’ve never seen that before – and I’m stunned that any big employer would write it in a public job spec in 2019.
“To make things worse, stated below the job description is the BBC’s supposed commitment to equality, including ‘social background’ and ‘disability’. Is this an episode of W1A? This clanger proves that in reality the corporation’s recruitment practices fall well short of its supposed values – and the process for creating and publishing truly inclusive job adverts needs immediate attention and revision. Frankly, this shoddy posting should never have made it into the public domain.
“In my opinion, these placements should pay at least the National Minimum Wage, and be open to everyone who wants to do them. It really is that simple. An employer like the BBC should be leading on this stuff, not getting caught out for tone deaf mistakes. We have asked the BBC to examine this advert and make the necessary changes so that these roles – and the way they are advertised – align with their stated values and commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion.”
Below is Graduate Fog’s email to the BBC, challenging their unpaid work experience placements at Wimbledon 2019:
TO: HR at the BBC
FROM: Graduate Fog
DATE: 29 April 2019
SUBJECT: Unpaid work experience at Wimbledon 2019
It has been brought to our attention that BBC Sport is advertising seven work experience placements to coincide with this year’s Wimbledon tennis tournament.
Despite stating that the successful applicants will be expected to perform numerous important and valuable duties for the BBC, and that the successful applicants will need to be available on set days, the job category is stated as ‘volunteering’.
Assuming this means that the placements are unpaid, I would be grateful if you could explain:
1) How the BBC feels this fits with UK employment law
2) How the BBC feels this fits with your stated commitment to equality of opportunity, in particular on the grounds of ‘social background’.
I am also troubled by the insistence that “Physical fitness is essential” for applicants. Can you please confirm that you do not wish to hear from those with disabilities which may restrict their mobility or stamina?
In my opinion, these work experience placements should be re-classified as junior contract jobs, paid at least the National Minimum Wage, and the BBC should take steps to make sure they are awarded to the best applicants regardless of their “physical fitness”. Should any of those seven have additional needs, the BBC should make the necessary adjustments. I very much hope that you will consider making the necessary changes so that is the case. This would also bring these roles into line with the BBC’s stated commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion.
Finally, if you agree that this advert falls below the standards that the public should expect from the BBC, please can you explain how this came about, and how you plan to ensure this does not happen again.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Tanya de Grunwald
We’ll let you know when we hear back from the BBC. Watch this space…
* HAVE YOU DONE ‘WORK EXPERIENCE’ AT THE BBC?
Was it just work shadowing – or were you doing real work? Did you have set hours and set responsibilities?